ANDREW M. MOSKOWITZ ESQ.
Practice AreasEn Espanol using FreeTranslation.com.
State
of New York's Appellate Division First Department
Appellate Practice
Andrew Moskowitz
has handled numerous appeals in a broad variety
of cases including commercial matters, civil rights
cases and negligence litigation. Reported cases include: Sarnowski
v. Air Brook Limousine, No. 06-2144 (3d Cir. Dec.
12, 2007) USA
v. $734,578.82 , 286 F.3d 641 (3d Cir. 2002); Nance
v. City of Newark, No. 03-4741,
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2490 (3d Cir. 2005); Roberts
v. Borough of Brent, No. 02-2126 (3d Cir. 2003); Lodato
v. Sunrise Markets, Inc., Docket No. A-470-02T5
(App. Div. 2003); Lampley
v. Orange Bd. of Educ.,
Docket No. A-6080-01T3 (App. Div. 2003), certif. denied,
179 N.J. 313 (2004), Shmueli
v. N.Y. City Police Dep't, 295 A.D.2d 271, 743 N.Y.S.2d
871 (1st
Dep't 2002); and Dedes v. Cambria, 258 A.D.2d 495,
684 N.Y.S.2d 622 (2d Dep't 1999). In addition, prior
to graduating from law
school, he gained a great deal of experience relevant
to appellate work, including an internship with a Judge
in the Southern District
of New York; a research assistant position for a law
school professor; and an editor position with the Fordham
Environmental Law Journal.
Mr. Moskowitz has experience in handling a diverse variety of matters,
such as:
- Commercial litigation
including breach of contract actions and the enforceability
of covenants not to compete/restrictive covenants.
For example, in June 2002, the Firm successfully opposed a client's
former employer's attempt to enforce a restrictive covenant (see
opinion by Miriam N. Span, J.S.C, Presiding Judge for Chancery
Division's General Equity Part).
- Consumer
Fraud actions(see
Decision by Hon. Carmen Messano, J.S.C. denying defendants'
motion for summary judgment in Torres v. Harrison ) In Torres v. Harrison, the Firm represented
Monica Torres who purchased a home in Bayonne, New Jersey
for $126,000.00.
After
the closing, she learned that the house had dozens of problems
that rendered it uninhabitable and in violation of the city
housing code. In July 2004, just prior to the start of
the trial, the defendants
agreed to settle the case for $68,000.00.
- Employment litigation including gender and race discrimination;
the Family and Medical Leave Act (and New Jersey's Family
Leave Act); and the Americans with Disabilities Act
- Personal injury matters
- Insurance
coverage including declaratory judgment actions on behalf
of policyholders (see
Koloski v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 5 Misc. 3d 1028A,
2004 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2619 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Nov. 3, 2004);
insurance company claimed that insured had
engaged
in life insurance fraud and firm successfully defeated
motion for
summary judgment dismissing insured's claim for breach
of contract); see also Windsor
Mt. Joy Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 264 F. Supp. 2d 158
(D.N.J. 2003) (in which firm represented policyholder
in action to recover proceeds after a boat that he had
insured
was
stolen)
- Debt Collection litigation
- First Amendment cases
- Litigation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Construction matters, including representation of contractors
and subcontractors in proceedings to assert mechanics
liens
- Real Estate litigation, including matters in
Tenancy Court
- Matrimonial actions and child custody disputes
Indiana
Personal Injury Lawyer New
York Attorneys
Disclaimer:
The materials and content provided on this web site are for
general informational purposes only and should not be considered
legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by
the transmission or downloading of any information provided
at this web site. Before acting on any of the materials presented
here, it is advised that you seek legal counsel.
Site designed with built-in optimization by
Search Engines 411
Copyright © 2002-2006
|